Clinical Trial Results:
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Dose-ranging, Phase 2b Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Summary
|
|
EudraCT number |
2020-002759-39 |
Trial protocol |
GR FR IT ES PL |
Global end of trial date |
13 Apr 2023
|
Results information
|
|
Results version number |
v1(current) |
This version publication date |
12 Apr 2024
|
First version publication date |
12 Apr 2024
|
Other versions |
Trial Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
Subject Disposition
Baseline Characteristics
End Points
Adverse Events
More Information
|
|||
Trial identification
|
|||
Sponsor protocol code |
20190194
|
||
Additional study identifiers
|
|||
ISRCTN number |
- | ||
US NCT number |
NCT04833855 | ||
WHO universal trial number (UTN) |
- | ||
Sponsors
|
|||
Sponsor organisation name |
Amgen Inc.
|
||
Sponsor organisation address |
One Amgen Center Drive, Thousand Oaks, CA, United States,
|
||
Public contact |
IHQ Medical Info-Clinical Trials, Amgen (EUROPE) GmbH, MedInfoInternational@amgen.com
|
||
Scientific contact |
IHQ Medical Info-Clinical Trials, Amgen (EUROPE) GmbH, MedInfoInternational@amgen.com
|
||
Paediatric regulatory details
|
|||
Is trial part of an agreed paediatric investigation plan (PIP) |
No
|
||
Does article 45 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Does article 46 of REGULATION (EC) No 1901/2006 apply to this trial? |
No
|
||
Results analysis stage
|
|||
Analysis stage |
Final
|
||
Date of interim/final analysis |
13 Apr 2023
|
||
Is this the analysis of the primary completion data? |
No
|
||
Global end of trial reached? |
Yes
|
||
Global end of trial date |
13 Apr 2023
|
||
Was the trial ended prematurely? |
No
|
||
General information about the trial
|
|||
Main objective of the trial |
The main objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of tezepelumab on improvement in the Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days (UAS7).
|
||
Protection of trial subjects |
The study was conducted in accordance with the protocol and with consensus ethical principles derived from international guidelines including the Declaration of Helsinki and Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences International Ethical Guidelines, applicable International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, and applicable ICH laws and regulations.
|
||
Background therapy |
Participants maintained a stable dose of second generation H1-antihistamines (sgAH) as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||
Evidence for comparator |
- | ||
Actual start date of recruitment |
15 Apr 2021
|
||
Long term follow-up planned |
Yes
|
||
Long term follow-up rationale |
Safety | ||
Long term follow-up duration |
4 Months | ||
Independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) involvement? |
No
|
||
Population of trial subjects
|
|||
Number of subjects enrolled per country |
|||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Japan: 38
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Korea, Republic of: 16
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
France: 5
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Germany: 10
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Greece: 13
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Italy: 9
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Poland: 16
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Spain: 12
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
United States: 38
|
||
Country: Number of subjects enrolled |
Canada: 26
|
||
Worldwide total number of subjects |
183
|
||
EEA total number of subjects |
65
|
||
Number of subjects enrolled per age group |
|||
In utero |
0
|
||
Preterm newborn - gestational age < 37 wk |
0
|
||
Newborns (0-27 days) |
0
|
||
Infants and toddlers (28 days-23 months) |
0
|
||
Children (2-11 years) |
0
|
||
Adolescents (12-17 years) |
0
|
||
Adults (18-64 years) |
168
|
||
From 65 to 84 years |
15
|
||
85 years and over |
0
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recruitment details |
Participants were enrolled at 56 study centers in Japan, Republic of Korea, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Poland, Spain, Canada, and the United States, and participated from 15 April 2021 to 13 April 2023. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-assignment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Screening details |
Participants with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and symptomatic despite treatment with sgAH were randomized based on if they were previously treated with anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) therapies or were anti-IgE naïve. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period 1 title |
Overall Study (overall period)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this the baseline period? |
Yes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocation method |
Randomised - controlled
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blinding used |
Double blind | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Roles blinded |
Subject, Investigator, Monitor, Carer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arms
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are arms mutually exclusive |
Yes
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received placebo SC Q2W for 16 weeks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Omalizumab 300 mg SC Q4W | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants without previous anti-IgE experience were randomized to receive omalizumab 300 mg SC every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Active comparator | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received placebo SC Q4W at intervening study visits for 16 weeks, to ensure participants received an injection Q2W.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Omalizumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
Xolair®
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received omalizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received placebo SC Q4W at intervening study visits for 16 weeks, to ensure participants received an injection Q2W.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tezepelumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
AMG 157
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm title
|
Tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W for 16 weeks. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Arm type |
Experimental | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product name |
Tezepelumab
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investigational medicinal product code |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other name |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical forms |
Solution for injection
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Routes of administration |
Subcutaneous use
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dosage and administration details |
Participants received tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q4W for 16 weeks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baseline characteristics reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Omalizumab 300 mg SC Q4W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without previous anti-IgE experience were randomized to receive omalizumab 300 mg SC every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W for 16 weeks. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
End points reporting groups
|
|||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive placebo subcutaneously (SC) every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 16 weeks. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||
Reporting group title |
Omalizumab 300 mg SC Q4W
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants without previous anti-IgE experience were randomized to receive omalizumab 300 mg SC every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W
|
||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W for 16 weeks. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in UAS7 at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The UAS is a CSU-specific patient-reported outcome measure with 2 components: Hives Severity Score (HSS) for number of wheals and an Itch Severity Score (ISS) for itch intensity, and are each scored from 0 (no wheals, no itch) to 3 (>50 wheals, severe itch) for the previous 24 hours. The HSS and ISS are combined to give a daily UAS ranging from 0 to 6. The sum of the daily UAS over a 7-day period provides the UAS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 42 (severe urticaria). The least squares mean (LSM) estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline UAS7, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in urticaria activity. The full analysis set (FAS) included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Primary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W - Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
100
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.6 [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Repeated measure model | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LSM difference | ||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
-1.1
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-5.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
3.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
2.2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [1] - Nominal p-value. Model parameters: stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline UAS7, treatment, study week, interaction between treatment and study week. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Statistical analysis title |
Tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W - Placebo | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comparison groups |
Placebo v Tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Number of subjects included in analysis |
100
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis specification |
Pre-specified
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Analysis type |
superiority | ||||||||||||||||||||
P-value |
= 0.99 [2] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Method |
Repeated measure model | ||||||||||||||||||||
Parameter type |
LSM difference | ||||||||||||||||||||
Point estimate |
0
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Confidence interval |
|||||||||||||||||||||
level |
95% | ||||||||||||||||||||
sides |
2-sided
|
||||||||||||||||||||
lower limit |
-4.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
upper limit |
4.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Variability estimate |
Standard error of the mean
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Dispersion value |
2.2
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [2] - Nominal p-value. Model parameters: stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline UAS7, treatment, study week, interaction between treatment and study week. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in ISS over 7 Days (ISS7) at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The ISS is a component of the UAS, a CSU-specific patient-reported outcome measure and assessed itch intensity, with daily scores ranging from 0 (no itch) to 3 (severe itch) for the previous 24 hours. The sum of daily ISS over a 7-day period provides the ISS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 21 (severe itch). The LSM estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline ISS7, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in urticaria activity. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in HSS over 7 Days (HSS7) at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The HSS is a component of the UAS, a CSU-specific patient-reported outcome measure and assessed the number of wheals, with daily scores ranging from 0 (no wheals) to 3 (>50 wheals) for the previous 24 hours. The sum of daily HSS over a 7-day period provides the HSS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 21 (severe wheals). The LSM estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline HSS7, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in urticaria activity. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with a UAS7 of ≤ 6 (Minimal Residual Disease) at Week 16 | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The sum of the daily UAS over a 7-day period provides the UAS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 42 (severe urticaria). Minimal residual disease in UAS7 was defined as a score ≤ 6 and indicates well-controlled urticaria and a good response to treatment. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with a Change from Baseline in UAS7 of ≤ -10 (Minimal Important Difference) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The sum of the daily UAS over a 7-day period provides the UAS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 42 (severe urticaria). Minimal important difference in UAS7 was defined as a change from baseline of ≤ -10. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with ISS7 = 0 at Week 16 (Complete Resolution) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The sum of daily ISS over a 7-day period provides the ISS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 21 (severe itch). An ISS7 = 0 indicates a complete resolution of itch. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with a UAS7 = 0 at Week 16 (Complete Response) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The sum of the daily UAS over a 7-day period provides the UAS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 42 (severe urticaria). A complete response was defined as UAS7 = 0 at Week 16. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with HSS7 = 0 at Week 16 (Complete Resolution) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The sum of daily HSS over a 7-day period provides the HSS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 21 (severe wheals). An HSS7 = 0 indicates a complete resolution of hives. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with a Change from Baseline in ISS7 of ≤ -5 (Minimal Important Difference) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The sum of daily ISS over a 7-day period provides the ISS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 21 (severe itch). Minimal important difference in ISS7 was defined as a change from baseline of ≤ -5. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with a Change from Baseline in HSS7 of ≤ -5.5 (Minimal Important Difference) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The sum of daily HSS over a 7-day period provides the HSS7, from 0 (no symptoms) to 21 (severe wheals). Minimal important difference in HSS7 was defined as a change from baseline of ≤ -5.5. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Weekly Sleep Quality Score (SQS7): Sum of Daily SQS at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The SQS was assessed by the participant through 3 questions relating to falling asleep (Q1), wakefulness (Q2), and feeling rested in the morning (Q3). The sum of the 3 daily sleep quality items over 7 days, ranged from 0 (good quality sleep) to 63 (poor quality sleep). The LSM estimates were based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline SQS7 - sum of SQS, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in sleep quality. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Weekly Sleep Interference Score (SIS7) at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The SIS is part of the Urticaria Patient Daily Diary and was assessed by the participant using the electronic diary once daily in the morning. Participants scored sleep interference on a scale of 0 (no interference) to 3 (substantial, woke up often, severe interference with sleep). The SIS7 was a sum of the daily scores over 7 days. The LSM estimates were based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline SIS7, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in sleep interference. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in SQS7: Sum of Average Daily Q1 - Q3 at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The SQS was assessed by the participant through 3 questions relating to falling asleep (Q1), wakefulness (Q2), and feeling rested in the morning (Q3). The sum of average daily Q1 - Q3 score was generated by averaging 3 daily sleep quality items and then summing the daily average over 7 days with a score ranging from 0 (good quality sleep) to 21 (poor quality sleep) (sum of the average daily Q1 - Q3). The LSM estimates were based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline SQS7 - sum of average daily Q1 - Q3, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in sleep quality.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Urticaria Control Test (UCT) Score at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The UCT assesses disease control in participants with CSU through a retrospective validated scoring system, evaluating the physical symptoms of chronic urticaria (itch, hives and/or angioedema) and the effectiveness of treatment over 4 weeks. It consists of 4 questions with 5 answer options, scored from 0 to 4, and the UCT score is the sum of all 4 questions, with total score ranging from 0 (no control) to 16 (complete control). A score of ≥ 12 indicates well-controlled urticaria and a score of ≤ 11 points indicates poor disease control. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in disease control. The LSM estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline UCT score, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in Weekly Angioedema Activity Score (AAS7) at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The AAS is a 5-item patient-reported outcome measure used to determine angioedema activity. Participants retrospectively documented the presence or absence of angioedema in the past 24 hours, and the AAS daily score ranged from 0 to 15 points, assessing 5 key factors when angioedema is present, including duration, physical discomfort, impact on daily activities, impact on appearance, and overall severity). The daily AAS scores are summed for 7 days to form the AAS7 with a range of 0 (not present) to 105 (most severe angioedema activity). Negative changes from baseline indicate an improvement in angioedema activity. The LSM estimates were based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline AAS7, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Cumulative Weeks that Participants Achieved AAS7 = 0 at Week 16 (Angioedema Occurrence Free) | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The AAS is a 5-item patient-reported outcome measure used to determine angioedema activity. Participants retrospectively documented the presence or absence of angioedema in the past 24 hours, and the AAS daily score ranged from 0 to 15 points, assessing 5 key factors when angioedema is present, including duration, physical discomfort, impact on daily activities, impact on appearance, and overall severity). The daily AAS scores are summed for 7 days to form the AAS7 with a range of 0 (not present) to 105 (most severe angioedema activity). Angioedema occurrence free was defined as AAS7 = 0. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL) at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The CU-Q2oL is a 23-item, self-reported urticaria-specific measure to evaluate 6 dimensions of quality of life (QoL): pruritus, impact on life activities, sleep problems, limitations, looks, and swelling. The total score is transformed to a linear scale of 0 to 100 with a higher CU-Q2oL score indicating a higher QoL impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in QoL. The LSM estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline CU-Q2oL score, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The DLQI is a 10-item, participant-completed, health-related QoL assessment with content specific to those with dermatology conditions. The DLQI evaluates participant perceptions including dermatology-related symptoms and feelings, impacts on daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and side effects of treatment. The recall period was 1 week. The DLQI total score ranges from 0 to 30 with a higher score indicating a greater QoL impairment. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in QoL. The LSM estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline DLQI score, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data are included.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL) at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The AE-QoL is a validated angioedema QoL questionnaire for participants with angioedema. It consists of 17 questions evaluating 4 domains including functioning, fatigue/mood, fear/shame, and food with a recall period of 4 weeks. The total score is transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating a worse impairment in QoL. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement in QoL. The LSM estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline AE-QoL score, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with angioedema presence at baseline and at least 1 non-missing AE-QoL record were included.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Angioedema Control Test (AECT) Score at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The AECT is a patient-reported outcome measure to evaluate disease control in the domains of signs and symptoms, QoL, anxiety/fear, and effectiveness of therapy. The total AECT score ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating better controlled disease. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement in angioedema control. The LSM estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline AECT score, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with angioedema presence at baseline and at least 1 non-missing AECT record were included.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with an AECT Score = 16 at Week 16 (Complete Control) | |||||||||||||||
End point description |
The total AECT score ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating better controlled disease. Complete control was defined as AECT score = 16. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data at Week 16 and angioedema presence at baseline and at least 1 non-missing AECT record were included.
|
|||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Change from Baseline in the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Chronic Urticaria (WPAI-CU) Score at Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The WPAI-CU is a questionnaire that assesses the impact of an intervention on work productivity, evaluating 4 areas including absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity loss, and activity impairment over the past 7 days. Each of the areas is scored separately as a percentage, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. The LSM estimates are based on the repeated measure model with stratification factor (prior anti-IgE status), baseline WPAI-CU score, treatment, study week and the interaction between treatment and study week. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with observed data were included for each question.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline and Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Cumulative Days of sgAH Rescue Medication Use from Baseline to Week 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
Participants recorded any need of sgAH rescue medication in their daily electronic diary. The FAS included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product. Participants with data available are included.
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Baseline to Week 16
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Serum Concentration of Tezepelumab [3] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
The lower limit of quantification was 10 ng/mL, and values below this limit were set to zero.
The pharmacokinetic analysis set included participants who received tezepelumab and had at least 1 sample with a measurable serum concentration. Participants with data available at each time point are included.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Week 1 pre-dose, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 32
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notes [3] - The end point is not reporting statistics for all the arms in the baseline period. It is expected all the baseline period arms will be reported on when providing values for an end point on the baseline period. Justification: The pre-specified endpoint is for the serum concentration of tezepelumab in the tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W and tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W treatment arms only. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point title |
Number of Participants with Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point description |
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant irrespective of a causal relationship with study treatment. TEAEs were AEs that started on or after the first dose of investigational product up to the end of study (Week 32). A serious AE (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: immediately life-threatening, required hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or other medically important serious event. The safety analysis set consisted of all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point type |
Secondary
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
End point timeframe |
Day 1 Week 1 to Week 32
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No statistical analyses for this end point |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse events information
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeframe for reporting adverse events |
Deaths collected from enrollment to the end of study visit, up to 38 weeks. SAEs and other AEs were collected from Day 1 up to Week 32, up to 32 weeks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adverse event reporting additional description |
Final Analysis
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment type |
Systematic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary used for adverse event reporting
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary name |
MedDRA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dictionary version |
26.0
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting groups
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Placebo
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive placebo SC Q2W for 16 weeks. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Omalizumab 300 mg SC Q4W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants without previous anti-IgE experience were randomized to receive omalizumab 300 mg SC Q4W for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive tezepelumab 210 mg SC Q4W for 16 weeks. Participants received placebo SC at intervening study visits to ensure all participants received an injection Q2W. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group title |
Tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting group description |
Participants with and without previous anti-IgE therapy experience were randomized to receive tezepelumab 420 mg SC Q2W for 16 weeks. Participants maintained a stable dose of sgAH as background medication from screening Visit 2 (Day -14) to the end of the Safety Follow-up Period (up to Week 32). | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frequency threshold for reporting non-serious adverse events: 5% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
Substantial protocol amendments (globally) |
|||
Were there any global substantial amendments to the protocol? Yes | |||
Date |
Amendment |
||
01 Sep 2021 |
- To incorporate regulatory authority recommendations, to align with international treatment guidelines, to reduce patient burden,
and improve study experience by reducing the frequency of select eDiary data collection.
- Updated schedule of activities to reduce frequency of chronic urticaria QoL questionnaire, DLQI assessment, work productivity, and activity impairment questionnaire (chronic urticaria); and urticaria severity score was removed.
- The washout period for prior use of biologics was reduced.
- Excluded treatments, medical devices, and/or procedures were updated to clarify the use of systemic corticosteroids, and to exclude H2 antagonists and leukotriene receptor antagonists.
- Updated primary objectives and endpoints to clarify the definition of intercurrent events, to add a secondary objective to evaluate the effect of tezepelumab on participants achieving complete control of angioedema disease, and to clarify minimal residual disease endpoints.
- The grading scale for adverse events was updated, and laboratory test results were updated to align for grading intensity.
- Covariates were updated to clarify the analysis of primary and key secondary endpoints using the baseline score of endpoint.
- Updated handling of missing and incomplete data to clarify addressing missing data in binary efficacy endpoints.
- Exclusion criteria were updated to clarify QuantiFERON-tuberculosis Gold Plus test requirements and hepatitis-B core antibody testing, only where required by the local country or region. |
||
30 Sep 2021 |
The error in the study schema was rectified. |
||
26 Apr 2022 |
- Number of anti-IgE experienced participants was reduced and interim analysis 2 was added for administrative decision making purposes. The original interim analysis 2, which was a futility analysis was removed. The total number of participants in the primary analysis was reduced.
- The number of participants for the anti-IgE experienced cohort was reduced due to limited source of participants.
- Objectives and endpoints language was updated in response to regulatory advice regarding HSS7 and ISS7 assessments.
- The exclusion criteria were updated to clarify that COVID-19 vaccines were allowed provided that the vaccine was not administered within 7 days before or after any study dosing visit.
- Clarified that participants were required to document both HSS and ISS daily with a recall period over 24 hours, and to define that a weekly UAS score represented the sum over a period of 7 days.
- Statistical considerations were updated to accommodate changes in number of participants, and to relocate the key secondary endpoints, as well as changes to the multiple testing strategy. |
||
Interruptions (globally) |
|||
Were there any global interruptions to the trial? No | |||
Limitations and caveats |
|||
Limitations of the trial such as small numbers of subjects analysed or technical problems leading to unreliable data. | |||
None reported |